- Posts: 9
bead change in martini2 and martini2
- FJSP22
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Fresh Boarder
Less
More
1 year 9 months ago #9412
by FJSP22
bead change in martini2 and martini2 was created by FJSP22
Hi everyone!
I have to parametrize a serie of tropolone derivatives. I can easily assign beads to carbonyl and hydroxyl groups. Initially I assigned two beads for the remaining 5 non-hydrogen atoms. I`m not sure if it was a wise decision. I also cannot find examples of Martini topologies for 7-membered ring. Is it a quite complex molecule to map?
Thanks in advance,
Fred
This image is hidden for guests.
I have to parametrize a serie of tropolone derivatives. I can easily assign beads to carbonyl and hydroxyl groups. Initially I assigned two beads for the remaining 5 non-hydrogen atoms. I`m not sure if it was a wise decision. I also cannot find examples of Martini topologies for 7-membered ring. Is it a quite complex molecule to map?
Thanks in advance,
Fred
This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riccardo
- Offline
- Platinum Boarder
1 year 9 months ago - 1 year 9 months ago #9415
by riccardo
Replied by riccardo on topic bead change in martini2 and martini2
Hi, are you using Martini 2 or Martini 3? Assuming you're going for Martini 3 (which I'd recommend, especially for rings), that's how I would go about the mapping (I can't see the image but I'm assuming this is the molecule:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tropolone.png
):
github.com/ricalessandri/Martini3-mappin...b/main/tropolone.pdf
with SN6 for the hydroxyl S-bead and TN6a for the ketone. TC5 for the remaining 2 aromatic T-beads. Note that the S-bead (in green) maps 3 non-hydrogen atoms, so that, excluding the C=0 group, you're left with 4 atoms to be mapped (and hence 2 x T-beads are appropriate).
This follows guidelines and bead type recommendations (Table 1) in onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/adts.202100391 . Table 1 can also be found at: github.com/ricalessandri/Martini3-small-...ding_block_table.pdf
with SN6 for the hydroxyl S-bead and TN6a for the ketone. TC5 for the remaining 2 aromatic T-beads. Note that the S-bead (in green) maps 3 non-hydrogen atoms, so that, excluding the C=0 group, you're left with 4 atoms to be mapped (and hence 2 x T-beads are appropriate).
This follows guidelines and bead type recommendations (Table 1) in onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/adts.202100391 . Table 1 can also be found at: github.com/ricalessandri/Martini3-small-...ding_block_table.pdf
Last edit: 1 year 9 months ago by riccardo.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FJSP22
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Fresh Boarder
Less
More
- Posts: 9
1 year 9 months ago #9418
by FJSP22
Replied by FJSP22 on topic bead change in martini2 and martini2
Thank you again, Ricardo! I'm using Martini 3. Your beads suggestions seems promising. I'll follow your suggestions.
Thank you so much.
Thank you so much.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mathar
- Offline
- Fresh Boarder
Less
More
- Posts: 1
1 year 8 months ago #9449
by mathar
Replied by mathar on topic bead change in martini2 and martini2
I am now shifted to martini3 from martini2; looks like ligands parameterized with martini2 are not readable with martini3 force field ??? Are SN5 and TC5e beads changed in martini3?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riccardo
- Offline
- Platinum Boarder
1 year 8 months ago #9455
by riccardo
Replied by riccardo on topic bead change in martini2 and martini2
You cannot mix models between martini 2 and martini 3. The two force fields have a different "balance", it would be like mixing AMBER with OPLS.
Both bead types SN5 and TC5e did not exist in Martini 2.
Both bead types SN5 and TC5e did not exist in Martini 2.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.105 seconds