normal Converting all atom to coarse grained with backward.py

  • Hot
  • Hot's Avatar Topic Author
  • Visitor
4 years 6 months ago #8306 by Hot
The all-atom simulation uses the GAFF force field,which is converted from AMBER to gromacs format by ACPYPE.
I want to convert all atom to coarse grained with backward.py, while the GAFF force field was not found in backward.
After running do-mapping.sh, it looks like this: Residues defined for transformation from gromos to martini. How can I modify it before I can continue to use backward?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 6 months ago - 4 years 6 months ago #8308 by riccardo
I don't know the specifics of the script you are using (which I think is from a tutorial) but make sure that you call backward.py by saying "-from amber -to martini" and that Mapping files for the amber-martini conversion exists.
Pasting the actual commands used here in the forum would also help debugging.
Last edit: 4 years 6 months ago by riccardo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Hot
  • Hot's Avatar Topic Author
  • Visitor
4 years 6 months ago - 4 years 6 months ago #8309 by Hot
Yeah,it is from the tutorial. I've changed it to "-from amber -to martini", it appears:
Problem determining mapping coordinates for atom NA1 of residue DAT.
atomlist: ('TP1', 'NA1', 'TC1', 'TC2', 'TC3')
want: NA1 ('C10', 'H8', 'H9', 'O4', 'C9', 'O3')
have: ('H2', 'H3', 'O5', 'H6', 'C1')
Bailing out...
(NA1', 'TC1', 'TC2', 'TC3')
Last edit: 4 years 6 months ago by Hot. Reason: don't show

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 5 months ago #8314 by riccardo
This is always a little cryptic; you should look at the labels mentioned and whether they make sense. This means, have a look at the mapping file (in folder "Mapping") for the residue DAT and check whether those atom labels make sense (both the atomistic and the CG ones): there must be something wrong there.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.091 seconds